F1 News: Eddie Jordan Deems Andretti Cadillac Rejection “Scandalous”

Former F1 team owner Eddie Jordan has slammed the decision to reject Andretti Cadillac’s bid to join the Formula 1 grid, branding it as “scandalous.” Jordan expressed his dismay over the rejection, emphasizing Andretti’s potential contributions to the sport.

Key Takeaways:

• Eddie Jordan criticized the decision, highlighting Andretti’s potential contribution to F1.
• He pointed out that there’s provision for 24 cars on the grid, suggesting Andretti’s entry wouldn’t have been unprecedented.
• Jordan voiced concerns over the closed-shop mentality of existing F1 teams, arguing for a more inclusive approach to new entries.

In a recent episode of the Formula For Success podcast, Eddie Jordan, renowned in the Formula 1 community as a former team owner, didn’t mince words when discussing the rejection of Andretti Cadillac’s bid to secure a spot on the prestigious F1 grid. Reflecting on the days of intense competition in the sport, Jordan lamented the decision that saw Andretti sidelined despite meeting all the criteria set by the FIA.

Jordan didn’t hold back in criticizing Liberty Media and the existing F1 teams for their stance on Andretti’s application. Despite Andretti fulfilling the required criteria, including financial backing from General Motors and engine supply arrangements with Renault, Jordan felt the decision was unjust. He underscored the missed opportunity for employment and economic growth, especially in the crucial US market for Formula 1.

Speaking on the podcast, Jordan emphasized, “In my day, when I started my first race in 1991, there were 39 cars waiting to try and qualify for 24 slots on the grid.” He continued, “I should remind [you] that there is already a provision for 24 [cars] on the grid. Not 22, not 20: 24.”

Jordan’s frustration was palpable as he spoke about the implications of rejecting a prominent name like Andretti from entering F1. He highlighted the employment opportunities Andretti’s entry could bring and criticized the closed-shop mentality that seems to prevail among existing teams.

Concluding his remarks, Jordan urged for a more inclusive approach, drawing parallels with other sports leagues like the Premier League in football. He argued for a natural flow of teams in and out of the competition, rather than a closed-off system dominated by a select few.

As the Formula 1 community continues to debate the decision, Jordan’s outspoken criticism sheds light on the complexities surrounding new entries into the sport and raises questions about the future direction of Formula 1.