FIA Clarifies Madrid Grand Prix Speculations: A Deep Dive into the Rumored Shift from Barcelona

In a recent statement, the FIA addressed the swirling rumors about Madrid potentially hosting the Spanish Grand Prix from 2026, a move that would see the race shift from Barcelona. FIA Senate President, Carmelo Sanz de Barros, emphasized the importance of following proper procedures, a process that has not yet started for Madrid.

Key Takeaways:

• Clarification on Process: Carmelo Sanz de Barros, FIA Senate President, emphasized the essential procedural steps for initiating a Grand Prix in a new location. He confirmed that these steps have not been initiated for Madrid, countering prevailing speculations.
• Political Considerations: De Barros expressed concerns about political influences, drawing parallels with Madrid’s failed bid for the 2030 Olympic Games. He pointed out the similarities in terms of leaks and procedural lapses, suggesting a similar pattern might be emerging in the case of the Grand Prix.
• Madrid vs. Barcelona Rivalry: The potential relocation of the Spanish Grand Prix from Barcelona to Madrid is not just a sporting shift but also a chapter in the historical rivalry between the two cities. De Barros criticized the manner in which this rivalry is influencing the narrative around the Grand Prix.

The world of Formula 1 racing is abuzz with speculation over the future of the Spanish Grand Prix, with recent rumors suggesting a potential move from its long-standing home in Barcelona to the capital city, Madrid. In a crucial statement that seeks to clear the air, Carmelo Sanz de Barros, the president of the FIA’s Senate and head of the Spanish automobile federation, addressed these rumors head-on.

His words, as quoted by Autosport.com, are pivotal in understanding the current situation: “There is a clear process to have a grand prix in a place, and I don’t think that the process is being followed based on what you read.” De Barros’ statement is a direct response to the widespread media speculation, emphasizing the absence of any formal procedure initiation by the Spanish automobile federation, which is the starting point for any new competition in the country.

De Barros continued to outline the process, stating, “Then, when the Spanish federation consider that this project is a valid project and that they are interested, they channel it to where? To the FIA, because they have to homologate it.” He clarified that without the initial step of the Spanish federation receiving the project for analysis, no further progress or consideration by the FIA can occur.

Beyond the procedural aspects, de Barros raised significant concerns about political influences and the narrative being constructed in the media. He drew attention to the larger context of Madrid’s rivalry with Barcelona, and its impact on the way the situation is being portrayed. This includes references to Madrid’s unsuccessful bid for the 2030 Olympic Games, a bid marred by procedural failings and leaks, suggesting a cautionary parallel.

In conclusion, while the possibility of Madrid hosting a Formula 1 race is an exciting prospect, it remains shrouded in speculation. The FIA’s response, through Carmelo Sanz de Barros, serves as a reality check on the rumors, emphasizing the necessity of following established procedures and cautioning against the influence of political narratives. As the situation develops, the racing world eagerly awaits official confirmation or denial of Madrid’s entry into the Formula 1 calendar.